Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > Sardelac Sanitarium

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jun 07, 2006, 03:51 AM // 03:51   #1
Desert Nomad
 
bilateralrope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Zealand
Guild: Xen Of Onslaught (Xen of the Pacific division)
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default show us how many teams are waiting for ABs

Currently when you try to join an alliance battle you get "no opposing party" with no indication of if its because there aren't enough Luxon teams and/or there aren't enough Kurzick teams.

What I would like to see is that when you try to join an AB but can't you get the message:
"Not enough players. There are x Kurzick teams and y Luxon teams waiting to join an Alliance Battle"

The numbers will be the number of teams on each side that have clicked the enter mission button.

Now, although I dont do Fort Aspenwood or Jade Quarry, it seems that a simmilar message could work there.
bilateralrope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2006, 02:38 AM // 02:38   #2
Desert Nomad
 
bilateralrope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Zealand
Guild: Xen Of Onslaught (Xen of the Pacific division)
Default

10 days with no reply at all. This seems a reasonable length of time before bumping it.

With this suggestion, if you were kurzick and got told that there were only 2 kurzick teams but 4 luxon ones, you would know to go tell the other kurzicks to form a team and join. But if you saw 8 Kurzick teams waiting, 2 Luxon you would know you would be in for a long wait.
bilateralrope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2006, 02:42 AM // 02:42   #3
Technician's Corner Moderator
 
Tarun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The TARDIS
Guild: http://www.lunarsoft.net/ http://forums.lunarsoft.net/
Default

/signed - There has been rumors that they only have limited servers for these things though. So who knows.
Tarun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2006, 05:28 AM // 05:28   #4
Desert Nomad
 
bilateralrope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Zealand
Guild: Xen Of Onslaught (Xen of the Pacific division)
Default

I'm guessing the rumor isn't true, but came about when someone was waiting for a match and a friend was waiting for a match for the other side. It could of quite easily of been at 5 teams out of the 6 waiting.

But there is a limited number of servers for it, then they could say that the servers are full and you are at position x in the queue.

But untill I see proof of limited server numbers, I'm going to assume that ANET hasn't added such a limit, as I can see no reason why such a limit is useful for anyone.
bilateralrope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2006, 06:01 AM // 06:01   #5
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Sientir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: At DigiPen.
Guild: Biscuit of Dewm [MEEP]
Default

Such a limit is useful for ANet in terms of keep operating costs down. I do agree with the idea, however, so.../signed.
Sientir is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I'm going to be doing some waiting... Sol_Vie Off-Topic & the Absurd 1 Jan 31, 2006 04:30 AM // 04:30
Balanced Teams and Spike Teams skizdidlyidler Gladiator's Arena 3 Jan 25, 2006 05:15 PM // 17:15
The News I was waiting for... D.E.V.i.A.N.C.E Off-Topic & the Absurd 28 Nov 25, 2005 08:31 PM // 20:31
Waiting for sorrows One and Two The Riverside Inn 2 Sep 06, 2005 05:07 AM // 05:07


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:47 PM // 17:47.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("